As an avid student of hypnosis (both conversational and otherwise), I’ve wondered recently if conversational or “covert hypnosis” (what I call “coversis”) is really hypnosis after all.
My first exposure to conversational hypnosis were the free hypnosis audios I downloaded from Igor Ledochowski’s site located here. There’s a script on that page that causes the free audio offer to chase you up and down the page like a dog (that’s way too happy to see you), so I finally relented, took the bait and downloaded the free audios. I was surprised at how much stuff he gave away as part of the free offer. I thought it would be mostly teaser stuff, but surprisingly, it was a lot of really solid content. The stuff was really good, so like a powerful drug, I was quickly hooked and wanted more.
After quickly plowing through the free stuff, I immediately whipped out my credit card and bought the complete Conversational Hypnosis course and devoured that as well. I wonder if that’s what they wanted me to do? LOL. The course is remarkably complete and comprehensive. There is just a ton of really, good, solid, useful stuff in there. And as you’re listening to it, it just makes perfect sense and you find yourself nodding along with it (one of the indications you may be in a trance yourself!)
Now, the biggest trouble I’ve had with the whole conversational or covert hypnosis approach is the concern that some of it just makes you sound “weird” to people. I mean, you EXPECT hypnotists to say weird things, but in a conversational setting, people aren’t supposed to know you’re a hypnotist and you don’t really expect normal people in everyday conversations to say weird hypnotic things like “as you notice your eyes getting heavier, you find you fall quickly and easily into a trance.” That’s kind of a weird thing to hear, in a conversation setting, coming from someone who’s not purporting to be a hypnotist.
But the flip side, is that if you DON’T say weird things — if you don’t take it as far as getting to some sort of hypnotic trance — then you wonder if the hypnotic language you’re using really goes far enough to qualify as hypnosis. Are you really hypnotizing someone? Are you really learning how to hypnotize? Or are you just using words that hypnotists use?
This question was really brought home to me when I attended my first “actual” hypnosis class (i.e. a non-conversational, non-covert, straight-ahead “look into my eyes” approach) that worked extremely well and left no question in my mind at all as to whether or not the person was actually hypnotized (more on that in a later blog.)
In that class, the hypnotist — Jeffrey Stephens — said that two things are necessary for hypnosis… context and intent (you’ll see videos of Jeff teaching this concept below and when you click here to watch).
According to Jeff, the simple fact that the person knows you are a hypnotist sets the context. In traditional hypnosis, that is the case. In conversational or covert hypnosis, not so much. Intent, by and large, means the hypnotist’s intent to hypnotize you. Also present in conversational hypnosis, but that fact is (or should be) unknown to the subject which has got to impact the outcome.
So after learning both traditional hypnosis and conversational hypnosis (though not originally in that order), I am still left wondering, is conversational hypnosis really hypnosis?
If you know the answer (or have an opinion,) I welcome and encourage your comments below.